Attorney General Bird Leads Fight to Defend Pork Producers

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird led 21 other states on Sept. 30 in supporting the appeal of a district court ruling that upheld Massachusetts’s radical pork ban.

"Massachusetts’s new “Question 3” pork ban goes further than Proposition 12 by preventing other states from selling pork in, or even transporting pork through, Massachusetts if farmers do not comply with Massachusetts’s strict hog-housing requirements," according to a release. "This means that even if Iowa-produced pork meets all Iowa and federal safety and quality standards, but not Massachusetts’s new restrictions, they cannot do business in that state."

This pork ban will have effects far beyond Massachusetts’s borders, Attorney General Bird explains. Not only will pork producers and family farmers across the country face crippling costs that may force many to close shop, but families already facing skyrocketing prices for pork will see those prices continue to rise. The group of attorney generals also point out that the pork ban sets a dangerous precedent that would allow states to upend markets across the nation to push their political agendas.

“The Massachusetts pork ban is absolute hogwash,” Bird said in a release. “Iowa is the leading pork-producing state in the nation and is home to countless farms that Iowans have passed down through families for generations. With this ban, Iowa farmers are left with two drastic options: pay the extreme costs to comply with red tape that could drive them out of business, or be banned from selling their pork. Either option is a loss for Iowa’s hardworking family farmers and pork producers, but I won’t let that happen. Massachusetts does not get to tell Iowans how to raise their pork.”

The 21 attorney generals make it clear the Massachusetts pork ban violates the Constitution. Violations include: